Typology
Article
Scopes
Governance
When we put life in the center of governance, what changes in our social practices?
In a world marked by climate crisis and social inequalities, the concept of social biomimesis and bioregionalism emerges as a revolutionary proposal to rethink local governance. Oscar Gussinyer talks with Melina Ángel, an expert on biomimesis applied to social systems and a member of the Meraki organization in Colombia, together exploring how indigenous communities and ecosystems can inspire models of governance that put life in the center.
Listen to the Territories, Listen to Life
According to Melina, one of the keys to sustainable governance is to learn to listen deeply to territories. In Colombia, indigenous communities maintain a direct relationship with the land that goes beyond an extractive or utilitarian vision. “For these communities, land is not a resource; it is a living system with which to dialogue and harmonize,” he states.
This philosophy is reflected in its practices: before building a bridge or a path, they consult ecosystems and perform connection rituals. This shows a way of acting that prioritizes sustainability and respect for nature, creating a model that could be adopted by other local governments.
The Challenge to Decolonize Governance
Another important aspect of Melina's reflection is the recognition of how colonialism has marked the way we manage territories. In Europe, for example, colonial history has also left traces of government structures. Small communities, such as rural municipalities, often reproduce models of centralization that do not respond to the real needs of the territory.
Melina suggests a fundamental question to change this dynamics: “How can we put life in the center?” This perspective implies understanding what is alive in a territory, whether social needs, cultural tensions or ecological processes. Only through this listener can generate authentic and inclusive responses.
Harmonia entre Escales: From Local to Global
One of the challenges Melina highlights is the obsession to scale solutions. Nature teaches us that complexity emerges from local interactions: individuals, communities and their relationships. As well as a forest works from the harmony between trees, plants and animals, human communities also need listening dynamics and cooperation to flourish.
“Government is an act of sustaining what is invisible: connections, shared needs, relationships”, says Melina. These processes cannot be imposed from above, but must arise from the dynamics of each territory.
Biorregions: A New Way of Pertànyer
Bioregionalism offers a new way to understand territories. Rather than relying on arbitrary political boundaries, it recognizes the natural limits defined by local geography, ecosystems and cultures. “Bioregions are defined by themselves. They are spaces where communities feel they belong, where there is an intrinsic relationship with the land," Melina explains.
This deep connection with the territory not only satisfies vital needs, but also encourages reciprocity and regeneration. For example, rivers can be seen not as simple resources, but as part of a living system that needs care to regenerate and benefit the entire community.
An Economy from Life
Finally, Melina notes that it is necessary to rethink the economy. Rather than relying on extraction and export, we can be inspired by nature, where energy flows, resources and information are organized to generate local abundance. This does not mean isolation, but sustainable relationships with other bioregions.
“A forest is an example of living economy: it accumulates resources not to exploit them, but to sustain its entire life network. This is the model we should adopt," he concludes.
Biomimèsis: An Accessible Way for All
Melina notes that it is not necessary to be a biologist or have a specialized academic training to apply biomimesis. Life itself teaches us. “The key is to listen: listen to nature, listen to ourselves and listen to others. Life is inside us and around us. Just open to this connection."
This approach reminds us that we are part of the biosphere, not separate agents. If we learn to act with this conscience, we can build a more just, harmonic and aligned local governance with the processes of life.

Conclusion
Bioregionalism and biomimesis offer us an opportunity to rethink local governance from a more harmonious and connected perspective with nature. Melina Ángel reminds us that putting life at the center of decisions is key to creating models that are sustainable and inclusive, respecting both human needs and ecosystem dynamics. This transformation involves not only listening to territories but also learning the structures inherited from colonialism, to advance towards a more equitable relationship with land and communities.